Intelligent Decision
"We find that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board's real purpose, which was to promote religion in the public school classroom," he wrote in his 139-page opinion.The Dover policy required students to hear a statement about intelligent design before ninth-grade biology lessons on evolution. The statement said Charles Darwin's theory is "not a fact" and has inexplicable "gaps." It refers students to an intelligent-design textbook, "Of Pandas and People," for more information.
Jones wrote that he wasn't saying the intelligent design concept shouldn't be studied and discussed, saying its advocates "have bona fide and deeply held beliefs which drive their scholarly endeavors."
But, he wrote, "our conclusion today is that it is unconstitutional to teach ID as an alternative to evolution in a public school science classroom."
3 Comments:
I want to post my reply to somebody who commented on my cross-post at Illinoize that this must be a "proud day for me and my fellow Democrats."
My verbatim response was as follows:
Not a partisan issue nor a proud day. In fact, I have no objection to the teaching of Intelligent Design. I think I agree with the finding of the court that it is a theory that can be taught and discussed, but that it does not belong in biology class being taught as an alternative to evolution.
GOP made a comment on Illinoize that the photo I had put up was unnecessarily inflammatory. He was right.
Yeah Fritchey, screw the GOP wingnuts, let them rot in their intelligently designed hell. Impeach Bush, fire Cheney, and make Condi Rice get her teeth fixed.
<< Home