Twists and Turns - JCAR Update(s)
In my last post, I discussed my thoughts on member initiative projects, so I won't rehash that here.
One way that I think that he might try to do this (and I'm simply thinking out loud here, sort of) is via an agency reorganization. This would be an extraordinarily convoluted means of attempting to reach his goal, and I'm not sure that it would work in any event, but I just can't think of another means by which he could do it. (Another reason that this wouldn't make sense is that, if I am interpreting this section correctly, the House could nullify the Executive Order with a simple majority.)
For your reference, here is the Section that I am referring to.
SECTION 11. GOVERNOR - AGENCY REORGANIZATIONThe Governor, by Executive Order, may reassign functions among or reorganize executive agencies which are directly responsible to him. If such a reassignment or reorganization would contravene a statute, the Executive Order shall be delivered to the General Assembly. If the General Assembly is in annual session and if the Executive Order is delivered on or before April 1, the General Assembly shall consider the Executive Order at that annual session. If the General Assembly is not in annual session or if the Executive Order is delivered after April 1, the General Assembly shall consider the Executive Order at its next annual session, inwhich case the Executive Order shall be deemed to have been delivered on the first day of that annual session. Such an Executive Order shall not become effective if, within 60 calendar days after its delivery to the General Assembly, either house disapproves the Executive Order by the record vote of a majority of the members elected. An Executive Order not so disapproved shall become effective by its terms but not less than 60 calendar days after its delivery to the General Assembly.(Source: Illinois Constitution.)
The other thing that I find interesting is in Sen. Jones position and statement. There was a reported understanding among the leaders to stick together on the budget vote and any subsequent veto overrides. So Emil's standing with the Governor on this issue today would appear to be an outright 180 degree flip on the other leaders.
Going back on an agreement is never good form, that truism is magnified exponentially under the dome.
More substantively interesting is the Senate President's statement in the press release:
“The Governor has said he would not sign a budget that did not include his priority of health care. The four leaders knew the risk of negotiating an operating budget without the Governor in the room – I suggest today that I understand why the Governor is making this decision and I commit to working with him to fund health care within the operating budget that is on his desk.” said Senate President Emil Jones, Jr.
Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but that sounds like he is resigned to working solely within the present budget framework, by moving dollars around. It appears to signal a complete retreat from any significant new source of funding for healthcare.
Either way, there is sure to be enough spin on all sides of this latest development to create a new ride at the State Fair.
UPDATE - For those that don't know, I happen to be one of the members of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR). I have been advised that HFS will likely be filing rules for coverage expansion of both the 'Family Care' and 'Assist, Primary Care, Rx, Hospital' provisions of the Governor's plans. HFS counsel is maintaining that the Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment and Working Families Premium Assistance programs will not require rules, a position not necessarily shared by JCAR staff. Any expansion of All Kids would likely require new rules for Comprehensive Health Insurance Program.
When one looks at the members of JCAR, it's hard to tell how these rules are going to be received. Same fight, different battleground.
UPDATE - The update above is based solely on information provided to me by JCAR staff. In the interest of fairness, I want to point out here that I have also been advised that HFS is taking issue with the information as not being wholly correct. Not that HFS needs me to defend them, but I will say that I have known the Director and his immediate staff for quite some time and hold them in the highest regard. So for now, I'll simply let this issue play itself out and we'll see where it goes.